Pemalangan Tanah Sebagai Bentuk Resistensi Masyarakat Papua Barat Terhadap Pembangunan

Marthinus Ngabalin; Suwarto Adi; Tony Tampake

doi:10.36256/ijrs.v6i2.423

Pemalangan Tanah Sebagai Bentuk Resistensi Masyarakat Papua Barat Terhadap Pembangunan

Marthinus Ngabalin, Suwarto Adi, Tony Tampake

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the resistance efforts of West Papuans in land blocking in the form of demands for compensation, customary bars, complaints and demands, coordination with other parties and the use of traditional leadership systems. In Papuan culture, talking about land means talking about people at the same time. On the other hand, this research also analyzes the phenomenon of land blocking as a form of resistance to the development process in Papua. This stems from the concept that development that does not involve the community in the planning process will have an impact on the process. Resistance is seen as a model of resistance to the development process in the form of rejection, blockading and even carried out openly in the form of protests and demonstrations. The method used is qualitative research, using an ethnographic approach. Data collection techniques were carried out by observation, interviews and literature studies. Data analysis in the study adopted the Miles and Huberman interactive model which includes data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The research findings show that land for the Papuan people has a very important role in life and is interpreted as Mama who contains and gives life to humans. In addition, resistance is understood as a form of protest against the development process carried out on the land of the Papuan people

Keywords

Land Blocking; Resistance; Development; Traditional Leadership

Full Text:

PDF

References

Iriyanto, S. M., & Sitorus, Y. L. M. (2023). Pengaruh Kearifan Lokal dalam Penilaian Risiko Konstruksi. Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil, 29(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.14710/mkts.v29i1.54406

Karath, M. (2015). Accelerating the Development for the Welfare Community in the Land of Papua. Global Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(3), 30–43.

Kesaulija, F. F., Aipasa, M. I., & Suhardiman, A. (2023). Land use and land cover change in Manokwari, West Papua Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1192(1), 12045. IOP Publishing.

Lubis, A. F. (2021). Kedudukan Hukum Dari Hak Ulayat Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Pertahanan Negara Di Provinsi Papua Barat. Jurnal Esensi Hukum, 3(2), 170–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35586/esensihukum.v3i2.109

Raafi’i, A., Hakim, D. B., & Putri, E. I. K. (2018). Ketimpangan Pembangunan Antarwilayah Pengembangan di Provinsi Papua Barat. Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning (Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Perdesaan), 2(3), 244–257. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29244/jp2wd.2018.2.3.244-257

Rupiassa, A. A. D. (2024). Kelisanan dalam Resistensi Masyarakat Adat Terhadap Strukturalisme Pembangunan di Kabupaten Kaimana, Papua Barat. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 19(1).

Wijaya, A. I., Permadi, I., & Safiâ, I. R. (2018). Penyelesaian sengketa tanah ulayat pada proyek pembangunan jalan di Papua Barat (Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Sorong Papua Barat). Jatiswara, 33(3), 313–330.

Yansyah, M. F., Triatmojo, M. K., & Silalahi, R. P. (2022). Urgensi Penilai Pemerintah Dalam Pengalihan Hak Atas Tanah Ulayat Di Papua. JISMA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 1(5), 737–742. Retrieved from https://karya.brin.go.id/id/eprint/25358/1/Jurnal_Muhammad Fahmi Yansyah_Kanwil DJKN Papua, Papua Barat, dan Maluku_2022-5.pdf

Bukega, O. K. (2020). Orang Papua stop menjual" mama" tanah Papua: fenomena dan seruan sebagai upaya penyelamatan tanah Papua sebagai" mama" di tengah kemendesakan masa kini. Satya Wacana University Press.

Burke, P. (2003). Sejarah dan teori sosial. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Davis, E. F. (2008). Scripture, culture, and agriculture: An agrarian reading of the Bible. Cambridge University Press.

Erari, K. P. (2000). Tanah kita Hidup kita. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.

Martono, N. (2021). Sosiologi perubahan sosial: Perspektif klasik, modern, posmodern, dan poskolonial (sampel halaman). RajaGrafindo Persada Jakarta.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.

Moleong, L. J. (2001). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, cetakan keempatbelas. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya (Anggota IKAPI).

Nawawi, H. (1997). Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Jakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Nazir, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Riessman, C. K. (1993). Analysis of personal narratives. Inside Interviewing: New Lenses, New Concerns, 331–346.

Salim, A. (2002). Perubahan sosial: sketsa teori dan refleksi metodologi kasus Indonesia. PT. Tiara Wacana.

Sanapiah, F. (2009). Format-format penelitian sosial. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Scott, J. C. (1976). The moral economy of the peasant: Rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.

Scott, J. C. (1993). Kaum Tani. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in Movement: Social Movement Collective Action and Mass Politics in the Modern State. London: Cambridge University Press.

Winangun, W. (2004). Tanah: Sumber Nilai Hidup. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Tambunan, P. M. (2023). Ada Kesalapahaman Generasi Muda Papua soal Ganti Rugi atau Pelepasan Tanah Adat. Retrieved February 19, 2024, from tribunpapua.com website: https://papua.tribunnews.com/2023/10/26/ada-kesalahpahaman-generasi-muda-papua-soal-ganti-rugi-atau-pelepasan-tanah-adat

Leloltery, A. (2023). Kehadiran negara melindungi tanah ulayat di Papua. Retrieved February 19, 2024, from Antaranews.com website: https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3786048/kehadiran-negara-melindungi-tanah-ulayat-di-papua

Chairullah, E. (2023). Pemalangan Tanah Adat di Papua Harus Diatasi dengan Persuasif. Retrieved February 19, 2024, from mediaindonesia.com website: https://mediaindonesia.com/nusantara/596747/pemalangan-tanah-adat-di-papua-harus-diatasi-dengan-persuasi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v6i2.423